Corporate governance

Legislative and regulatory developments

The latest version of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (‘the Code’) was published on 8 December 2016. By means of a decree dated 29 August 2017, the Dutch government has designated the Code as applicable to Dutch companies with a public listing. The Code is based on the comply-or-explain principle and applies as from the financial year 2017.

Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report

This chapter reports on the application of the Code at Royal BAM Group. Together with the information about the corporate governance structure and the BAM corporate governance compliance overview (see corporate-governance), this comprises the ‘Corporate governance statement’ as specified in section 3 sub 1 of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report (‘the Decree’).

Information about BAM’s corporate governance structure and compliance with the Code (clause 3.1 of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report), functioning of the General Meeting and the rights of shareholders (clause 3a sub b of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report) can be found on the Company’s website under the corporate governance heading. The most important aspects of BAM’s risk and control systems (clause 3a sub a of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report) are available in chapter 4 of this integrated report. Information about the composition and functioning of the Executive Board and Supervisory Board (clause 3a sub c of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report) is described in paragraphs 5.3 and 6.1 and the diversity policy for both boards is explained in this chapter and paragraph 6.1. A declaration with regard to the Decree on Article 10 of the EU Takeover Directive (clause 3d of the Decree with respect to the contents of the Executive Board report) can be found in paragraph 5.2.

Compliance with the Corporate Governance Code

Compliance with the Code is described in the BAM corporate governance compliance overview, which is available on This is to be read in conjunction with this section and is deemed to be incorporated into this section. In case there is a difference between the content of BAM’s publication and this section, this section will prevail. BAM fully complies with the principles and best practices of the Code. In accordance with the Code, the Company will submit any substantial changes in the main features of the corporate governance structure to the General Meeting for discussion purposes.

Corporate governance review 2020

The corporate governance structure of the Company was reviewed by the Executive Board and Supervisory Board in January 2020, assisted by the company secretary. The BAM corporate governance compliance overview was updated per 20 February 2020.


Best practice 2.1.5 of the Code stipulates that the diversity policy for the Executive Board and Supervisory Board should be explained in the Executive Board report as well as the way that it was implemented in practice, addressing (1) the policy objectives, (2) how the policy has been implemented and (3) the results of the policy in the past financial year.

Since the implementation of the new Code in 2017, the profile for the Supervisory Board holds diversity aspects, including a clear target for gender participation. This target of at least 30 per cent female and at least 30 per cent male members of the Supervisory Board does not differ from the target set in the previous profile. Since the general meeting in 2017, the composition of the Supervisory Board has been in line with this target. Per 31 December 2020 three out of seven members are female. Besides gender, diversity in background, nationality, expertise and experience in the Supervisory Board are equally important in order to provide most value.

The Supervisory Board meets these diversity requirements. The Supervisory Board has resolved that the diversity aspects set in the profile for the Supervisory Board will apply equally to the Executive Board and the Executive Committee. Regrettably, the composition of the Executive Committee is not (yet) in line with the target as far as gender participation is concerned as the Executive Committee currently only consists of male members.

In the search for suitable candidates for the Executive Committee, the Supervisory Board put a great deal of emphasis on identifying female candidates in order to ensure BAM had the very best talent available. This was expressed in the instructions to the external recruitment agency and in the subsequent review of the resumes and candidates. In the end however, it proved very difficult to identify and attract female candidates.

Given the above, it was concluded that even more emphasis should be put on this topic. In order to put this into effect, a director for diversity and inclusion has been appointed, with the CEO taking the lead as sponsor of diversity and inclusion. A BAM-wide programme for diversity and inclusion will be developed and implemented. BAM will increase its attention to women in our management development programmes to assure that the rise of women to our senior management positions is warranted. In addition, external recruitment agencies are instructed to identify capable female candidates for senior management positions. Finally, the Company will give preference to women in case of equal suitability in support of positive action.

New KPIs have been put in place in order to track and encourage growth in the numbers of new female hires, women in senior leadership roles and the overall female demographic. These apply to all of the BAM operating companies and will provide stretch of performance. A review of our senior talent has shown an increase in female representation in succession plans, with a target ratio of 1:3 women to men and BAM continues to monitor and improve on this. Notwithstanding the above, it should be noted that especially at the executive level, achieving the gender target is proving to be difficult due to the nature of the business and the lack of female candidates with sufficient management experience in the construction industry. It is therefore difficult to predict when this target is likely to be achieved.

However, it is within our gift to consider future needs today, and diversity has a major focus in how BAM is planning what the future leadership will, and needs to look like.

Sustainability, responsibility and delegation

The Executive Board is responsible for defining the sustainability policy, in consultation with the director for strategy, sustainability and innovation and the management of the operating companies.

Meetings with senior management are used to define sustainability issues, prioritise objectives, monitor activities and report results. Critical concerns are reported to the Executive Board at least in quarterly reports, or whenever more urgency is required. The Executive Board communicates to the Supervisory Board according planned reporting cycles, or whenever more urgency is required. Topics such as the reduction of CO2 emissions and waste, enhancing lives, along with business integrity and safety, apply to all BAM operating companies.

Each operating company has a management team member who shares responsibility for BAM’s sustainability activities. The operating companies report progress quarterly to the Executive Board and the director for strategy, sustainability and innovation, together with details of actions taken to support the Company’s business objectives. Progress against targets is reviewed and when necessary, additional actions are taken to ensure BAM’s sustainability targets are pursued and met.


Geen naam gevonden

Geen naam gevonden